Tikva Blaukopf Schein (Bar-Ilan Univ., Shalem College) – Hannibal and R’Akiva: Laughter in the Face of Defeat
Hannibal and R’ Akiva: Laughter in the face of defeat.
Hannibal and R’ Akiva are both leaders, with vulnerable, worried followers looking up to them,
at a time of great national insecurity. Both leaders respond to the anxieties of their dependents
with laughter. In this paper, I comparatively examine this laughter, and its varied success,
analysing it as a threat as well as a non-verbal speech act that foments the path of each respective
people. As with any comparison, diachronic or synchronic, the comparison elicits more than the
individual corpora. Through an expanded survey of examples taken from both Graeco-Roman
and Rabbinic literature, I question the function of laughter in leadership in its ability to cohering
a sense of self and other, as well as upturn the mainstream narrative, to great effect or loss.
I compare laughter to other non-verbal speech acts, locating each within the realm of
emotion. To what extent is the inherent potential for threat in laughter part of its very benefit?
How does the level of vulnerability of the one laughing or being laughed at affect the quality of
truth being expressed, or the resulting level of security? This paper focusses on the power of the
individual to shape a nation’s path through the steering of emotional interpretation. Moreover,
this research seeks to develop a closer understanding of how and when laughter emerges as a
societal response to crisis, and how the willingness or reluctance to admit laughter acts a
barometer of a society’s level of security.
Selected Bibliography
Bernays, J. (1853). Erganzung zu Aristoteles Poetik. Hertz.
Berryman, J. W. (1998). Laughter, power, and motivation in religious education. Religious
Education 93(3), 358-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034408980930308
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power (J.B. Thompson, ed. and G. Raymond and
M. Adamson, trans.). Harvard University Press.
Bruns, J. (2000). Laughter in the aisles: affect and power in contemporary theoretical and
cultural discourse. Studies in American Humor, 3(7), 5-23.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/42573389
Chapman A.J. (1983). Humor and laughter in social interaction and some implications for humor
research. In P.E. McGhee, J.H. Goldstein (eds.) Handbook of Humor Research. Springer.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_7
Corbeill, A. (1996). Controlling laughter: political humor in the late Roman republic. Princeton
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400872893
Damon, C. (2017). Emotions as a historiographical dilemma. In D. Cairns, & D. Nelis (eds.).
Emotions in the classical world: methods, approaches, and directions. 177-94. Franz Steiner.
Diamond, E. (2011). But is it funny? Identifying humor, satire, and parody in rabbinic literature.
In L.J. Greenspoon (ed.), Jews and Humor. 33-54. Purdue University Press.
doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq32v.8
Dillon, M. (1991). Tragic laughter. The Classical World, 84(5), 345-55.
https://doi.org/10.2307/4350851
Dodds, K. & Kirby, P. (2013). It’s not a laughing matter: critical geopolitics, humour and
unlaughter. Geopolitics, 18(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.668723
Douglas, M. (1985). Risk and acceptability according to the social sciences. Russell Sage
Foundation.
Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse University Press.
Fögen, T. (2001). Ancient theorizing on nonverbal communication. In R. M. Brend, A.K. Melby
& A. R. Lommel (eds.), LACUS Forum XXVII: Speaking and Comprehending. Linguistic
Association of Canada and the United States.
Fraenkel, Y. (1978). Hermeneutic Problems in the Study of the Aggadic Narrative. Tarbiz,
47(5738), 77-78.
Gilhus, I. S. (1997). Laughing gods, weeping virgins: laughter in the history of religion.
Routledge.
Gill, C. (1997). The emotions in Graeco-Roman philosophy. In S. Morton Braund & C. Gill
(eds.), The passions in Roman thought and literature. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586163
Ginzburg, J., Mazzocconi, C. & Tian, Y. (2020). Laughter as language. Glossa: a Journal of
General Linguistics, 5(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1152